Blockchain tokens are the foundation of decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and the broader Web3 ecosystem. Two of the most prominent token standards today are ERC-20, used on Ethereum, and SPL, Solana’s native standard. Both serve as the blueprint for fungible tokens, but their underlying architectures and performance capabilities are very different.
While ERC-20 benefits from a mature and widely adopted ecosystem, SPL shines in speed, scalability, and low transaction costs. Understanding these differences is crucial for developers, investors, and blockchain enthusiasts who want to make informed decisions about which platform aligns with their goals. In this blog, we’ll compare ERC-20 and SPL tokens in detail, explore real-world use cases, and highlight why performance matters in today’s fast-paced blockchain landscape.
What Is ERC-20?
Introduced in 2015, ERC-20 is Ethereum’s standard for fungible tokens. It defines a set of rules and functions, such as transfer, balanceOf, approve, and transferFrom, that tokens must follow to ensure interoperability within the Ethereum ecosystem. Because ERC-20 tokens adhere to a standardized framework, they can seamlessly interact with wallets, exchanges, and decentralized applications (dApps).
Despite its popularity, ERC-20 has some limitations. Ethereum currently handles around 15 transactions per second (TPS), which can create congestion during peak network activity. This congestion drives up transaction fees—sometimes exceeding $50 per transfer—and slows finality, meaning users may need to wait minutes or even longer for a transaction to be confirmed. While Ethereum’s upcoming upgrades aim to address these issues, scalability and cost remain challenges for ERC-20 tokens.
What Is SPL?
On the other hand, SPL (Solana Program Library) is Solana’s native standard for fungible tokens. Designed to take advantage of Solana’s high-performance blockchain, SPL allows developers to issue and manage tokens efficiently while keeping costs low. Solana’s architecture, powered by Proof-of-History (PoH) and the Sealevel parallel runtime, enables the network to process thousands of transactions simultaneously.
SPL tokens inherit several advantages from Solana’s infrastructure. Transaction fees are extremely low, often less than $0.001, and finality is achieved in under a second. The standard also supports advanced token functionalities, including interest-bearing tokens, transfer hooks, and integration with Token-2022 updates, allowing developers to design complex decentralized applications without performance bottlenecks.
Comparing Performance
When it comes to performance, SPL and ERC-20 diverge significantly. SPL tokens outperform ERC-20 in terms of transaction speed, cost, and scalability, making them ideal for applications where rapid execution is crucial. While Ethereum’s ERC-20 tokens remain highly interoperable and are backed by a vast ecosystem of wallets, exchanges, and dApps, the network’s limited throughput can hinder real-time applications such as high-frequency DeFi operations or in-game transactions.
In contrast, SPL tokens can handle tens of thousands of transactions per second. The combination of PoH timestamps and parallel execution allows multiple token transfers to occur simultaneously without conflict. This capability is particularly beneficial for DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, and gaming ecosystems, where instant finality and minimal transaction costs improve the user experience.
Furthermore, SPL tokens’ low fees make them practical for microtransactions and small-value transfers. In Ethereum, sending small amounts of ERC-20 tokens may not be cost-effective due to gas fees. Solana’s architecture removes this barrier, enabling new use cases such as micropayments, tokenized rewards, and frequent NFT trades.
Ecosystem Considerations
ERC-20 tokens benefit from a mature and widely integrated ecosystem. Developers can rely on a large number of wallets, exchanges, DeFi protocols, and developer tools. This network effect ensures interoperability and liquidity, making ERC-20 tokens suitable for applications where ecosystem support is more important than raw performance.
SPL tokens, while newer, are gaining traction rapidly. Platforms like Solend, Raydium, and Orca have successfully leveraged SPL tokens for DeFi operations, offering fast, low-cost trading, lending, and yield farming. NFT marketplaces also benefit from SPL tokens, allowing instant transfers and staking of assets. The growing Solana ecosystem is narrowing the gap with Ethereum, and developers increasingly see SPL as a performance-driven alternative.
Real-World Applications
Performance differences between SPL and ERC-20 manifest clearly in real-world applications. In DeFi, ERC-20 tokens are widely used for liquidity pools, lending protocols, and token swaps. However, during periods of network congestion, transactions can slow down, impacting user experience. SPL tokens, in contrast, enable instant settlement, allowing lending and trading platforms to operate seamlessly even under high demand.
NFT marketplaces also illustrate the performance gap. Ethereum-based NFT trading may experience delays or high fees during peak activity, while Solana’s SPL tokens facilitate instant trades and staking rewards. Gaming applications similarly benefit from SPL tokens, as in-game currencies and microtransactions require speed and minimal cost to maintain an engaging user experience.
Cross-chain bridges further highlight differences. ERC-20 tokens often require multiple confirmations when moving between chains, which adds latency and cost. SPL tokens integrate efficiently with cross-chain solutions, enabling near-instant transfers with minimal fees, expanding possibilities for DeFi and NFT interoperability.
Developer Considerations
When deciding between SPL and ERC-20, developers should consider multiple factors. Applications that require high-frequency transactions or low-cost operations benefit from SPL tokens. Microtransactions, gaming rewards, and high-speed DeFi lending are ideal use cases.
If ecosystem maturity, wallet support, and interoperability are priorities, ERC-20 remains the standard. Many developers build hybrid solutions, leveraging the strengths of both standards through cross-chain bridges and wrapped token solutions.
Advanced SPL features, such as Token-2022 hooks, also allow developers to design programmable, composable token systems without sacrificing performance. Meanwhile, ERC-20’s broad developer resources and documentation make it a safe choice for projects prioritizing ecosystem integration over raw speed.
Future Trends
Looking ahead, both standards are evolving to address their limitations and expand their capabilities. Ethereum’s Ethereum 2.0 upgrades aim to increase throughput and reduce fees, which could improve ERC-20 performance. Solana continues to enhance SPL token functionality, introducing new features that enable interest-bearing tokens, cross-chain interoperability, and advanced programmatic behavior.
Hybrid ecosystems will likely dominate the near future, with ERC-20 and SPL tokens coexisting. Developers may issue SPL tokens for high-speed operations while maintaining ERC-20 versions for broader ecosystem integration, creating a best-of-both-worlds scenario.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the choice between SPL and ERC-20 tokens comes down to performance versus ecosystem maturity. SPL tokens excel in speed, cost, and scalability, making them ideal for DeFi, NFTs, gaming, and micropayment applications. ERC-20 tokens, backed by Ethereum’s large and mature ecosystem, are excellent for projects prioritizing interoperability, liquidity, and developer support.
Both standards have strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these is essential for developers, investors, and users. As Solana’s ecosystem grows and Ethereum upgrades its network, the lines between performance and ecosystem support may blur, allowing token standards to complement each other in a rapidly evolving blockchain landscape.
By carefully considering your application’s needs, user expectations, and ecosystem priorities, you can make an informed decision and leverage the right token standard for maximum impact.
Listen to our podcast on Apple
Listen to our podcast on Spotify
